• Home
  • News
  • Personal Finance
    • Savings
    • Banking
    • Mortgage
    • Retirement
    • Taxes
    • Wealth
  • Make Money
  • Budgeting
  • Burrow
  • Investing
  • Credit Cards
  • Loans

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest finance news and updates directly to your inbox.

Top News

How Homeownership Became America’s Most Misunderstood Investment

April 29, 2026

Most Americans Get These 3 Longevity Questions Wrong. Their Retirement Accounts Are Paying for It.

April 29, 2026

10 Dollar-Store Items Seniors Buy to Save 30–50% Compared to Big-Box Retailers

April 29, 2026
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending
  • How Homeownership Became America’s Most Misunderstood Investment
  • Most Americans Get These 3 Longevity Questions Wrong. Their Retirement Accounts Are Paying for It.
  • 10 Dollar-Store Items Seniors Buy to Save 30–50% Compared to Big-Box Retailers
  • How To Interpret And Use Medicare’s Nursing Home Ratings
  • Wren Kitchens Ceases Operations in the US, Files for Bankruptcy
  • 7 Reasons You Shouldn’t Put a Dime Into Anything With the Trump Name on It
  • Five financial mistakes Americans in their 30s and 40s are making, expert warns
  • 20 Things To Know About A Medigap Policy
Wednesday, April 29
Facebook Twitter Instagram
FintechoPro
Subscribe For Alerts
  • Home
  • News
  • Personal Finance
    • Savings
    • Banking
    • Mortgage
    • Retirement
    • Taxes
    • Wealth
  • Make Money
  • Budgeting
  • Burrow
  • Investing
  • Credit Cards
  • Loans
FintechoPro
Home » Google defends billions paid to Apple, others that kept its search on top
Investing

Google defends billions paid to Apple, others that kept its search on top

News RoomBy News RoomSeptember 12, 202310 Views0
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email Tumblr Telegram

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A logo is pictured at Google’s European Engineering Center in Zurich, Switzerland July 19, 2018 REUTERS/Arnd Wiegmann/File Photo/File Photo

By Diane Bartz

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Google argued Tuesday the US was wrong to say the search and advertising giant broke the law to hold onto its massive market share, noting its search engine was wildly popular because of its quality and that dissatisfied users can switch with “a few easy clicks.”

The Justice Department has accused Google (NASDAQ:) of paying billions of dollars annually to device makers like Apple Inc (NASDAQ:), wireless companies like AT&T (NYSE:), and browser makers like Mozilla to keep its search engine’s market share at around 90%.

Google’s search engine is a key part of its business, driving advertising sales and other areas of profit for the world’s fourth most valuable company.

“This case is about the future of the internet,” said Kenneth Dintzer, arguing for the Justice Department that Google began in 2010 to illegally maintain its monopoly.

But Google’s lawyer, John Schmidtlein, said the payments compensate partners for the work of making sure that the software gets timely security updates and other maintenance.

“Users today have more search options and more ways to access information online than ever before,” Schmidtlein added. He went on to say Google won competitions that Apple and Mozilla held to pick best search engines.

Unhappy consumers, Google’s Schmidtlein argued, need just “a few easy clicks” to replace the Google app from their devices or call up Microsoft (NASDAQ:)’s Bing, Yahoo or DuckDuckGo in a browser to use an alternative search engine.

The Justice Department’s Kenneth Dintzer argued earlier on Tuesday that, in addition to the payments, Google manipulated auctions for ads placed on the internet in order to raise prices for advertisers.

‘SCALE MATTERS’

“Defaults are powerful, scale matters and Google illegally maintained a monopoly for more than a decade,” said Dintzer. The consequences are that without serious competition, Google innovated less and paid less attention to other concerns like privacy, he said.

Dintzer also said the department found evidence that Google had taken steps to protect communications about the payments it made to companies like Apple. “They knew these agreements crossed antitrust lines,” he said.

He showed a chat where Google CEO Sundar Pichai asked for the history function to be turned off.

William Cavanaugh, speaking for states led by Colorado, focused on allegations that Google balked at giving Microsoft access to features on Google Marketing Platform SA360, arguing that it did so for financial reasons.

The government’s first witness was Google economist Hal Varian, who was asked about discussions inside the company in the mid- and early 2000s about the importance of Google becoming the default on home pages.

“I think in general having the default is valuable,” he said.

Opening arguments in the trial occurred before a packed federal court in Washington. The trial is expected to last up to 10 weeks, with two phases. In the first, Judge Amit Mehta will decide if Google has broken antitrust law in how it manages search and search advertising.

If Google is found to have broken the law, Judge Mehta will then decide how best to resolve it. He may decide simply to order Google to stop practices he has found to be illegal or he may order Google to sell assets.

The government, in its complaint, asked for “structural relief as needed” but did not define it.

The legal fight has huge implications for Big Tech, which has been accused of buying or strangling small competitors but has insulated itself against many accusations of breaking antitrust law because the services the companies provide to users are free, as in the case of Google, or inexpensive, as in the case of Amazon.com (NASDAQ:).

Previous major antitrust trials include Microsoft, filed in 1998, and AT&T, filed in 1974. The AT&T breakup in 1982 is credited with paving the way for the modern cell phone industry, while the fight with Microsoft is credited with opening space for Google and others on the internet.

Read the full article here

Featured
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Articles

Most Americans Get These 3 Longevity Questions Wrong. Their Retirement Accounts Are Paying for It.

Make Money April 29, 2026

10 Dollar-Store Items Seniors Buy to Save 30–50% Compared to Big-Box Retailers

Savings April 29, 2026

Wren Kitchens Ceases Operations in the US, Files for Bankruptcy

Burrow April 28, 2026

7 Reasons You Shouldn’t Put a Dime Into Anything With the Trump Name on It

Make Money April 28, 2026

Five financial mistakes Americans in their 30s and 40s are making, expert warns

Personal Finance April 28, 2026

As Inflation Reignites, Should You Consider I Bonds?

Burrow April 27, 2026
Add A Comment

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Demo
Top News

Most Americans Get These 3 Longevity Questions Wrong. Their Retirement Accounts Are Paying for It.

April 29, 20264 Views

10 Dollar-Store Items Seniors Buy to Save 30–50% Compared to Big-Box Retailers

April 29, 20262 Views

How To Interpret And Use Medicare’s Nursing Home Ratings

April 28, 20264 Views

Wren Kitchens Ceases Operations in the US, Files for Bankruptcy

April 28, 20264 Views
Don't Miss

7 Reasons You Shouldn’t Put a Dime Into Anything With the Trump Name on It

By News RoomApril 28, 2026

You’d think investing alongside the most powerful person on Earth would be a slam dunk.…

Five financial mistakes Americans in their 30s and 40s are making, expert warns

April 28, 2026

20 Things To Know About A Medigap Policy

April 27, 2026

As Inflation Reignites, Should You Consider I Bonds?

April 27, 2026
Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Dribbble
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact
© 2026 FintechoPro. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.