• Home
  • News
  • Personal Finance
    • Savings
    • Banking
    • Mortgage
    • Retirement
    • Taxes
    • Wealth
  • Make Money
  • Budgeting
  • Burrow
  • Investing
  • Credit Cards
  • Loans

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest finance news and updates directly to your inbox.

Top News

Trump hits Federal Reserve Chair Powell over housing industry in latest attack, blasting mortgage rates

August 20, 2025

Are You A Solo Ager, Or Will You Be? What To Consider

August 20, 2025

More Gas Stations Are Quietly Hiking Credit Card Fees. Here’s How to Avoid Them.

August 20, 2025
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending
  • Trump hits Federal Reserve Chair Powell over housing industry in latest attack, blasting mortgage rates
  • Are You A Solo Ager, Or Will You Be? What To Consider
  • More Gas Stations Are Quietly Hiking Credit Card Fees. Here’s How to Avoid Them.
  • Why Job Security Is Winning Over Job Switching
  • How I Built a Business That Thrives Through Constant Disruption — and How You Can Too
  • Best Buy Launches Third-Party Marketplace Like Walmart
  • Tired of Burning Money at Conferences? Use This 5-Step Strategy for Real ROI
  • Will Trump Now Rig The CPI?
Wednesday, August 20
Facebook Twitter Instagram
FintechoPro
Subscribe For Alerts
  • Home
  • News
  • Personal Finance
    • Savings
    • Banking
    • Mortgage
    • Retirement
    • Taxes
    • Wealth
  • Make Money
  • Budgeting
  • Burrow
  • Investing
  • Credit Cards
  • Loans
FintechoPro
Home » Judge lifts Trump gag order in $250 million New York business fraud case
News

Judge lifts Trump gag order in $250 million New York business fraud case

News RoomBy News RoomNovember 16, 20230 Views0
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email Tumblr Telegram

A New York judge on Thursday temporarily suspended a gag order barring former President Donald Trump from commenting on court staff in his $250 million civil business fraud trial.

Associate Justice David Friedman of the New York Appellate Division’s First Department granted the request by Trump’s defense attorneys for an interim stay of the gag orders, citing the “constitutional and statutory rights at issue.”

The ruling lifts the gag orders that had been imposed on both Trump and the attorneys defending him in New York Attorney General Letitia James’ high-stakes fraud case in Manhattan Supreme Court.

James’ office had urged the appeals judge to deny Trump’s request, arguing that doing so could place the lower court’s staff “at risk of harassment or harm.”

Friedman’s terse ruling ordered James and Judge Arthur Engoron, who imposed the gag orders, to submit opposing briefs by Wednesday at noon. Trump’s lawyers must reply by the following Monday.

James accuses Trump, his two adult sons, the Trump Organization and top executives of falsely inflating the values of Trump’s assets to boost his net worth and reap financial benefits. She seeks $250 million in damages and wants to permanently bar Trump Sr., Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump from running a New York business.

Engoron had barred Trump from making public statements about his court staff on the second day of the trial, after Trump repeatedly targeted the judge’s principal law clerk.

A month later on Nov. 3, Engoron extended that gag order to Trump’s attorneys, accusing them of making “repeated, inappropriate remarks” about the same law clerk. The judge noted that his chambers have been “inundated” with threats and harassment since the trial began.

Trump has already violated the narrow gag order twice, catching a total of $15,000 in fines.

A spokesman for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the latest order. But Trump himself appeared to notice it, sharing articles with the news on his social media platform, Truth Social.

The request to pause the gag orders came one day after Trump and his co-defendants asked for a mistrial in the case, arguing that Engoron and his clerk are biased and that their conduct has “tainted these proceedings.”

Limiting their ability to address their alleged issues “is simply not justifiable and certainly not consistent with the avoidance of an appearance of impartiality,” the defendants wrote.

This is breaking news. Please check back for updates.

Read the full article here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Articles

RSS Feed Generator, Create RSS feeds from URL

News November 22, 2024

X CEO Linda Yaccarino addresses Musk’s ‘go f—- yourself’ comment to advertisers

News November 30, 2023

67-year-old who left the U.S. for Mexico: I’m happily retired—but I ‘really regret’ doing these 3 things in my 20s

News November 30, 2023

U.S. GDP grew at a 5.2% rate in the third quarter, even stronger than first indicated

News November 29, 2023

Americans are ‘doom spending’ — here’s why that’s a problem

News November 29, 2023

Jim Cramer’s top 10 things to watch in the stock market Tuesday

News November 28, 2023
Add A Comment

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Demo
Top News

Are You A Solo Ager, Or Will You Be? What To Consider

August 20, 20250 Views

More Gas Stations Are Quietly Hiking Credit Card Fees. Here’s How to Avoid Them.

August 20, 20250 Views

Why Job Security Is Winning Over Job Switching

August 20, 20250 Views

How I Built a Business That Thrives Through Constant Disruption — and How You Can Too

August 19, 20250 Views
Don't Miss

Best Buy Launches Third-Party Marketplace Like Walmart

By News RoomAugust 19, 2025

Best Buy is revealing a new third-party marketplace that opens the doors to smaller vendors,…

Tired of Burning Money at Conferences? Use This 5-Step Strategy for Real ROI

August 19, 2025

Will Trump Now Rig The CPI?

August 19, 2025

People on This Diet Lost Twice As Much Weight — Without Cutting Calories

August 19, 2025
Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Dribbble
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact
© 2025 FintechoPro. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.